Ship demand packets faster.
Every material claim traces to its source — and nothing unsupported leaves the system. Demand packets and medical chronologies for plaintiff PI firms, built on private infrastructure.
ABA 512 · Private inference · HIPAA-ready
Works with your workflow
Source documents
Extracted facts
Demand draft
Section: Injuries
Plaintiff sustained a herniated disc at L4-L5[2]
Citations issued under Veh. Code §§ 22350, 21703[4]
Total special damages: $34,032.00[5]
Built to be verifiable.
Every demand is graded against an evidence floor before it reaches your inbox. Numbers below are properties of the system, not aggregate customer claims.
0%
private infrastructure
on-premise inference, no cloud AI
0
cloud AI calls per case
no Anthropic, OpenAI, or Google SDKs
≥0%
citation coverage to ship
enforced by the quality grader
0
tenant-isolation tests
firm boundaries validated in CI
Industry context
0%
Average law-firm utilization rate — most of the day is lost to admin work, not billable practice.
Clio 2025 Legal Trends Report
ABA Opinion 512 compliant · Methodology & sources →
From case file to demand letter — without touching a tool.
Most tools require your paralegal to prompt them for every task. Pleadly runs in the background and delivers finished work to your inbox.
We connect to your CMS
Pleadly works standalone or integrates with Clio via native API. No CMS required. Upload case files directly or connect your system. Setup is scoped during onboarding.
Your cases are analyzed locally
Medical records, treatment timelines, and case notes are processed exclusively on Pleadly’s private inference server — never on cloud infrastructure.
Drafts arrive in your inbox
Demand letters, chronologies, and SOL alerts are delivered directly to your attorneys on your cadence. Every output requires attorney sign-off before it leaves your firm.
Quality improves with every case
Pleadly adapts to your firm’s voice, preferred arguments, and case patterns. Every accepted draft makes the next one more precise.
See what Pleadly produces.
A real demand letter, generated from medical records, billing statements, and a police report. Every material fact traces to a source document. Medical chronologies and case intelligence reports are produced the same way.
Chen & Associates
Attorneys at Law · 1200 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 · Los Angeles, CA 90017
RE: Martinez v. Apex Logistics, Inc.
Claim No.: WI-2024-47832
Date of Loss: January 15, 2024
2. Liability
On January 15, 2024, Ms. Martinez was lawfully stopped in traffic on the southbound 405 Freeway when a commercial vehicle operated by your insured, Apex Logistics, Inc., failed to maintain a safe following distance and struck Ms. Martinez's vehicle from behind at approximately 35 mph.4 The investigating officer issued two citations to the driver: Vehicle Code § 22350 (Unsafe Speed) and § 21703 (Following Too Closely).4
3. Medical Treatment Summary
Ms. Martinez was transported by ambulance to Cedars-Sinai Emergency Department on the date of the collision, where she presented with severe cervical and lumbar pain rated 8/10.1 A lumbar MRI on February 3, 2024 confirmed disc herniation at L4-L5 with moderate neural foraminal narrowing.2 She completed 24 sessions of physical therapy over eight months at LA Spine & Orthopedic.3
4. Special Damages
| Provider | Service | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Cedars-Sinai ER1 | ER Visit Level 4 (99284) | $8,450.00 |
| Advanced Imaging Center2 | MRI Lumbar Spine (72148) | $4,200.00 |
| Advanced Imaging Center5 | MRI Cervical Spine (72141) | $3,800.00 |
| LA Spine & Orthopedic3 | PT × 24 sessions (97110, 97140) | $14,400.00 |
| LA Spine & Orthopedic3 | Office visits × 6 (99213) | $2,340.00 |
| Walgreens Pharmacy | Medications (cyclobenzaprine, ibuprofen) | $842.00 |
| Total Special Damages | $34,032.00 | |
5. Demand
Applying a general damages multiplier of 3.5× to special damages of $34,032.00, general damages total $119,112.00. The total demand is:
$153,144.00
Special Damages: $34,032 + General Damages: $119,112
Synthesized from a sanitized California rear-end MVA case — Martinez v. Apex Logistics. All identifying information replaced. Actual work product is generated from your firm's case files.
Every claim, traced.
A claim in a Pleadly demand isn’t prose — it’s a link to the exact page and passage it came from. Any fact, verifiable in seconds.
In the demand
Lumbar MRI confirmed disc herniation at L4-L5 with moderate neural foraminal narrowing2.
Source document
p.1 · 02/03/2024
Advanced Imaging Center — MRI Report
Disc herniation at L4-L5 with moderate neural foraminal narrowing and mild impingement of the traversing L5 nerve root.
No source = no export
The same trace backs all 23 citations in this demand — and every demand Pleadly produces.
The only PI service built around attorney-client privilege from day one.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) established that using cloud AI tools that store inputs may constitute a waiver of attorney-client privilege. Pleadly's architecture eliminates that risk entirely — by design, not by policy.
Your case data never leaves your infrastructure. Unlike cloud-based alternatives, Pleadly runs local inference — no OpenAI, no Anthropic, no third-party AI providers.
- +No source = no export. Demand letters with unsupported claims cannot leave the system — verification is a delivery condition, not a disclaimer.
- +Privileged case content is processed on isolated infrastructure and never routed through public AI APIs.
- +Per-client data isolation enforced at three independent layers: database schema, vector store, and workflow state.
- +Full Architecture Attestation Letter provided at onboarding — a document your bar counsel can review.
- +No case data used for model training without explicit written opt-in. Default is off.
- +Client data deleted within 90 days of contract termination on written request.
Control Plane (Cloud)
Login, billing, account settings — zero case content
Vercel-hosted · No PHI
Intelligence Plane (Private Server)
All AI processing — medical records, case notes, demands
On-premise GPU · signed internal requests
Data Plane (Private Server)
Case storage, vector search, firm memory — fully on-premises
PostgreSQL · 57 firm-isolation tests
Standalone · Clio · Additional integrations in development
Read via secure API. Case content processed locally only.
Flat monthly. Cases included. No surprises.
One paralegal costs $8,000+/mo fully loaded. Pleadly replaces that entire pre-litigation layer — starting at a fraction of the cost.
Founding firm tier (limited availability). $997/mo pilot, then locks to $1,497/mo for life.
Up to 15 cases/mo
First 5 firms only. Direct founder access. Locks to Growth pricing at month 4.
- 15 cases processed/month
- Full managed pipeline: intake → demand prep
- Medical chronologies & treatment timelines
- Treatment gap detection
- SOL monitoring & alerts
- Monday morning intelligence brief
- Case intelligence dashboard
- Clio integration
+ 4 more
Up to 25 cases/mo
The full intelligence layer for growth-focused PI firms.
- 25 cases processed/month ($65/case overage)
- Everything in Founding Firm
- Firm-specific style learning
- Comparable verdict anchoring (300+ CA verdicts)
- Contradiction detection pre-generation
- Negotiation prep memo
- Lien tracking & exposure alerts
- Clio integration
+ 3 more
Up to 50 cases/mo
Priority processing for established PI firms with volume.
- 50 cases processed/month ($50/case overage)
- Everything in Growth
- Priority processing queue
- Cross-matter intelligence
- Custom demand template alignment
- Clio + Filevine integration (coming soon)
- 24-hour turnaround SLA
- Dedicated case review dashboard
+ 3 more
Unlimited cases
Unlimited processing for multi-location and high-volume firms.
- Unlimited cases processed
- Everything in Managed PI
- White-glove intake setup
- All integrations + API access
- Custom demand template alignment
- Bi-weekly strategy calls
- Compliance attestation package
- Named account manager
+ 1 more
Per-Case Option
$225/case
No monthly commitment. Minimum 5-case batch to activate.
Attorney Control Guarantee
Every output requires attorney review and sign-off. You stay in control.
ABA Opinion 512 Compliant
Case content processed on secured local infrastructure. Never routes to third-party cloud APIs.
No long-term contracts. Cancel anytime. All plans include ABA 512 attestation letter.
Savings model
Estimate your firm's savings.
Adjust the inputs to your workflow. This is an illustrative model, not a measured customer outcome — see methodology for how Pleadly grades its own work product.
Your assumption, not ours
BLS May 2024 median: $29.33/hr
300
hours / month
$9,000
cost / month
3,600
hours / year
$108,000
cost / year
At 10 cases/month and 30 hrs saved per case, that's 3,600 paralegal hours annually — about 1.7 full-time employees.
Want to see what Pleadly actually outputs for a case like yours?
Schedule a DemoFounding firm tier (limited availability) — $997/mo pilot, then $1,497/mo locked for life
See what Pleadly delivers
in 20 minutes.
We'll run a live case through the full pipeline — intake, chronology, demand draft, and source citations — so you can evaluate the output before committing.
20-minute demo · No preparation required · No credit card